‘Bridgerton’: Don’t watch for the historical accuracy. Watch for the juicy drama

At this point — if you have not heard or seen Bridgerton, you need to pay attention, because it is a great show.

Based on Julia Quinn’s novel series of the same name, “Bridgerton” is a historical romance. But do not let that scare you. Yes, most historical romances are sometimes a corn-fest told by boring white male characters. Not “Bridgeton.”

“Bridgerton” is told from a female’s perspective. Daphne is out for her first social season and couldn’t be more ready. The social season is the time of year where girls of age are put out into society to find a husband. Beside this expected plot line, there is much more that Bridgeton offers.

There are many subplots under the main plot, some of which are almost more entertaining than Daphane’s adventures. The series gives you family drama, a prince, rivalries and a super handsome duke who won’t marry. My favorite character is Lady Whistledown, the town’s gossip writer that, while anonymous, holds a lot of power. Supremely important and devastatingly rude, she scares even the stiff-looking, self-important men.

Through it all, we see a historical romance explore sexuality, passions, and love without shame. Think “50 Shades of Grey,” but more reserved and heartfelt. If you’re not interested yet, the show incorporates orchestra versions of modern songs for that pop yet historical aesthetic. Maybe you’d come for the plot, but you’d definitely stay for the music.

We also see Black people in the position of power. In “Bridgerton”, the main ones are the Duke (Daphne’s love interest) and the Queen. This is different for a show like this, especially one that seems to be inspired by a Jane Austen novel.

With all the drama, the music, and the refreshing change from typical casting motifs, “Bridgerton” is a delicious show that raises the bar high above past stuffy historical romances. It’s a nice change, and I promise that even men will love it.